Precautions for feed mold remover

  & nbsp; & nbsp; After chickens eat feed contaminated with mycotoxin, it will damage the body's parenchymal organs, inhibit the normal development of the body's immune organs, thus reducing the body's disease resistance and immunity, but also lead to liver toxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hematotoxicity, etc., and destroy the body's normal physiological function< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> The ovaries of laying hens are atrophic, degenerative and necrotic, the egg laying rate is reduced, the fertilization rate of breeding eggs is reduced, feed indigestion, diarrhea, adenogastritis, myogastritis, liver and kidney function damage, weight loss, and the death rate is increased. On the surface, it seems that it is caused by bacteria and viruses. In fact, the real culprit behind the scenes is the "background disease" caused by mycotoxin poisoning. Therefore, mycotoxins are known as the "fuse" of various diseases and the "invisible killer" of the current breeding industry< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> At present, mold removal is the main measure to eliminate the harm of feed mold, and the research and application of mold removal agents has become a hot issue at present. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the existing feed mold removers? How should farmers choose< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> From the survey results, activated carbon can absorb toxins and water, protect intestinal mucosa, and have a certain effect on diarrhea. The disadvantage is that it not only adsorbs toxins, but also nutrients< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> Fluorspar powder and montmorillonite can adsorb mycotoxins and nutrients, and long-term use will increase the metabolic burden of the kidney and cause secondary pollution< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> Copper sulfate and heavy metal salts are toxic to the environment and poultry, and should not be used for a long time< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> Aluminum magnesium silicate has selectivity to aflatoxin with strong polarity and weak adsorption to other mycotoxins. It is insoluble in water, and long-term use will also increase the metabolic burden of the kidney< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> Propionic acid and calcium propionate can inhibit and prevent mold, but they have no effect on the contaminated feed< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> Biological agents are mostly esterified glucomannan oligosaccharides, compound enzyme preparations, probiotics, prebiotics and other substances. Such products are pollution-free, can biodegrade mold, can also be selectively adsorbed, and do not cause secondary pollution. However, good and evil people are mixed, which makes it difficult for farmers to distinguish the authenticity< br style="font-family: "sans serif", tahoma, verdana, helvetica; font-size: 12px; white-space: normal;"/> From the perspective of production practice and research and analysis, farmers should choose a mold remover that integrates biological mold dissolution, biological mold dissolution, intestinal conditioning, liver protection and other functions, and only adsorbs mycotoxins, not nutrients, and will not cause secondary pollution and metabolic burden.